$MTSI · 海外大V持仓追踪

$MTSI 现在是什么情况？

最近有人说了 $MTSI 什么？

下面是最近 8 条提及 $MTSI 的公开帖，按时间倒序。每条都附原帖链接，可自行核对。

• 2026-08-26中性原文
  I know everyone’s watching $NVDA earnings right now… But did you know Landmark signed a 4 year CW agreement with US customer to ensure “sufficient supply”? So now you have: - $LITE (capacity gone) - $COHR (capacity gone) - Landmark (capacity committed) - $AAOI (capacity for transceivers) - $MTSI (not online) - $SMTC (limited) I remember saying earlier this year CW lasers would be the next optical shift and heavily bottlenecked by Nvidia? So fun watching this play out, with players signing LTAs already to 2030 (signaling less availability for other players). Implications for $SIVE / Win Semi are very material as one of the few remaining CW merchant suppliers with capacity (+ CPO-grade lasers). Let’s see how they execute.
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-08-25看空原文
  Lot of people were wondering about $SIVE earnings in 2 days. What I'm watching out for: 1. I'm hoping for more visibility on photonics co-development/qualifications/contracts. -> $AAOI stated multiple customers approaching them for CPO lasers (but had to turn them away) -> $MTSI stated many customers approaching them for CW capacity (but doesn't come online until H2 2027) So read through for a company serving as $GFS reference laser, $JBL for pluggables (ex. intel siph), to Ayar for CPO. And in a merchant position: -> with independent CW DFB supply (with Win semi) -> CPO-grade lasers. Is incredibly positive for more customers approaching Sivers. 2. Ongoing developments turning into volume -> I'm most excited about $JBL, which would probably be the main revenue ramp in H1 2027. -> $AEVA is likely much smaller in comparison, but should be a contributor H2 2026. -> Ayar and optical I/O players already stated 2028 for HVM, so not really expecting much there. -> Co-developments from their other pluggable players (from last ER) turning into qualifications -> volume). Aside from that: 3. NASDAQ listing -> We already got timelines for that "next few quarters", so it's not really a focus to narrow that down further. Always nice to get an update. 4. Financials -> Again, current financials aren't a focus for qualification-cycle players. Just a heads up, there's some one-time accounting this quarter, which affects things optically. Main thing is volume ramps for future quarters. -> revenue pipeline increase -> any early volume contracts signed Balance sheet concerns should be cleared now given their recent $70m fundraising + bootstrap dilution overhang gone. Bonus cookies: -> Any information about allocations secured "eg. we have substantial CW capacity secured -> would be extremely high signal given current shortages. -> Reiterate demand that AOI, Macom, Lumentum, Coherent stated. "eg. any capacity we get would be filled from demand" $AAOI had their massive $30 -> $220 rally after they stated like $471M expected capacity in 2027, and reiterated that into revenue guidance. (but then had a lot of ATMs) An ambitious bull case + full capacity revenue statement for future timelines like H1 2028 for Sivers would be nice, but not expected. A further re-rating would help for M&A with a Cloud Light type acquisition for revenue acceleration in future earnings. Obviously Sivers has other volume ramps, but I think photonics is what the market is primarily underwriting. Regardless, excited for what's up and coming.
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-08-24中性原文
  @adiradir734145 I think markets just need to let the masterchef $SIVE cook. From other earnings, everyone seems to be going out and approaching players like $MTSI or $AAOI for agreements. So, seems like there's a decently high chance Sivers gets some new qualifications or co-developments.
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-08-24中性原文
  @Meatusmax @adiradir734145 Good question, it's mainly third party commentary + actions around $SIVE. Ayar probably speaks volumes to me most removing $LITE / $MTSI from their supply chain section of their site. Then just featuring Sivers by itself for the laser suppliers. VP at Ayar also said Sivers was ... "essential to powering our optical I/O solution", which is pretty high signal commentary. Then you have $JBL that built a 1.6T LRO after selecting Sivers, which is very rare. And bragged about their technological moat at one of the fireside chats. Then $GFS choosing Sivers as the reference laser too and featuring them in their presentations... Feels like all your leading players are moving forward with Sivers for some reason? And I'd assume these leading companies did their DD
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-07-13中性
  @IrisWan39849142 $AAOI 的收入主要来自可插拔光模块，他们在开发/送样相关激光器，但在 CPO 上还没拿到任何设计订单。 像 $MTSI 这种，在 CPO 激光器上不知为何感觉已经掉队了。 CEO 对量产时间点的说法是「待定」，目前还在做可靠性验证。
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-06-07看空
  不是所有稀释都是坏事，取决于结构。 如果你做6亿美元ATM是为了和 $AAOI 一起扩激光器产能、冲2027上半年4.71亿美元/月（还在低市值区间），那是增值的。 如果你为纳斯达克上市要求稀释15%（$SIVE），募资用于并购，那是增值的。 如果你稀释（$IQE）是跟 $MTSI 做定向配售清掉旧的有毒债务，那是增值的。 如果你稀释60亿美元（$IREN），并且很可能在每次反弹时往公开市场里卖——背后还有 $SLNH / $BKKT 那批把散户带归零的吹票人，那就是掠夺性的。
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-04-30看多
  冷知识：之前应该没有任何美国大机构持有 $SIVE / $SIVEF，因为它是瑞典本地散户主导的股票。 还有基金授权限制美国基金进入（比如要求纳斯达克上市/10亿美元市值）。 现在完全变了——感谢欧洲媒体把本地持有人洗出去、Sivers即将纳斯达克上市、市值破10亿。 再说一遍：13亿美元对巨头和美国机构来说就是零花钱。 我高度确信很多机构想要CPO、硅光和激光器的敞口，因为全世界像 $LITE、$COHR、$MTSI 这样的就那么几家。 何况……一家很可能在 $AMD、$MRVL、$AAPL、Lightmatter、Ayar、AlChip、GUC、O-Net 以及金穹顶等供应链里的芯片法案激光器供应商。 这里面有份额积累的博弈论。 美国/西方散户现在持有大量流通盘（从瑞典卖家手里接的）。 而美国机构现在想要敞口。
  查看原帖 →
• 2026-04-30看空
  @KingDavidvs 开玩笑吗？$IQE 有 $MTSI 出4500万欧元帮它还债，性质完全不同。 不像某些无名垃圾股 $SLNH：1.97亿市值稀释10亿美元，5亿美元ATM专挑散户买的时候往市场里砸。
  查看原帖 →

去哪看 $MTSI 的完整时间线？

全部提及推文的中文时间线、每日推演、博主多空表态筛选，在 Serenity 持仓雷达里查看。相关工具：卡点猎手研究方法 · 策略回测器 · 催化剂雷达 · 深度长文。

常见问题

同板块还有哪些个股在被讨论？

$SIVE · $LITE · $AXTI · $AAOI · $NVDA · $MSFT · $COHR · $MRVL · $NBIS · $IREN · $GOOGL · $META　·　查看全部个股索引 →